1. My attitude to all information is that, once it is out in the public domain, then it is there for anyone to use. … 1. If I objected to fan fiction (or any other kind) derived from my stories, I’d be going mad by now. For instance, Neil Gaiman tells me - as if I needed telling - that he derived AMERICAN GODS from my EIGHT DAYS OF LUKE. I was pretty pleased. 2. I just say ‘Feel free’. It would happen even if I didn’t. 3. Heavens! Do some people use lawyers for this? The creeps get in everywhere. 4. Terry Pratchett, as always, speaks sound sense. 5. My opinion varies with the quality of what is written. Some is OUCH!!! Some is ‘I wish I had thought of that!’ …

    I have no objection at all to people writing and posting fanfiction based on my books. Once a book is published, it is for everyone to do what they want with.
    — 

    Diana Wynne Jones on fanfiction (via relatedworlds)

    Still the queen of awesome. And a notably better writer than some of the crazier anti-fanfiction writers.

    (via leahclaire)

     
  2. 19:48 23rd Jan 2012

    Notes: 16671

    Reblogged from noonday

    Tags: intellectual property

    sharkyteeth:

    “When the web started, I used to get really grumpy with people because they put my poems up. They put my stories up. They put my stuff up on the web. I had this belief, which was completely erroneous, that if people put your stuff up on the web and you didn’t tell them to take it down, you would lose your copyright, which actually, is simply not true.
    And I also got very grumpy because I felt like they were pirating my stuff, that it was bad. And then I started to notice that two things seemed much more significant. One of which was… places where I was being pirated, particularly Russia where people were translating my stuff into Russian and spreading around into the world, I was selling more and more books. People were discovering me through being pirated. Then they were going out and buying the real books, and when a new book would come out in Russia, it would sell more and more copies. I thought this was fascinating, and I tried a few experiments. Some of them are quite hard, you know, persuading my publisher for example to take one of my books and put it out for free. We took “American Gods,” a book that was still selling and selling very well, and for a month they put it up completely free on their website. You could read it and you could download it. What happened was sales of my books, through independent bookstores, because that’s all we were measuring it through, went up the following month three hundred percent.
    I started to realize that actually, you’re not losing books. You’re not losing sales by having stuff out there. When I give a big talk now on these kinds of subjects and people say, “Well, what about the sales that I’m losing through having stuff copied, through having stuff floating out there?” I started asking audiences to just raise their hands for one question. Which is, I’d say, “Okay, do you have a favorite author?” They’d say, “Yes.” and I’d say, “Good. What I want is for everybody who discovered their favorite author by being lent a book, put up your hands.” And then, “Anybody who discovered your favorite author by walking into a bookstore and buying a book raise your hands.” And it’s probably about five, ten percent of the people who actually discovered an author who’s their favorite author, who is the person who they buy everything of. They buy the hardbacks and they treasure the fact that they got this author. Very few of them bought the book. They were lent it. They were given it. They did not pay for it, and that’s how they found their favorite author. And I thought, “You know, that’s really all this is. It’s people lending books. And you can’t look on that as a loss of sale. It’s not a lost sale, nobody who would have bought your book is not buying it because they can find it for free.”
    What you’re actually doing is advertising. You’re reaching more people, you’re raising awareness. Understanding that gave me a whole new idea of the shape of copyright and of what the web was doing. Because the biggest thing the web is doing is allowing people to hear things. Allowing people to read things. Allowing people to see things that they would never have otherwise seen. And I think, basically, that’s an incredibly good thing.”

    Neil Gaiman on Copyright, Piracy, and the Commercial Value of the Web (X)

    (Source: roominthecastle)

     
  3. Way to go, Internet! The so-called “blackout” yesterday was DEFINITELY the MOST important copyright thing happening.

    schubertiade:

    heloiseagrippina:

    Supreme Court upholds copyright law protecting foreign works once freely available.

    The justices said in a 6-2 decision Wednesday that Congress acted within its power when it extended protection to works that had been in the public domain. The law’s challengers complained that community orchestras, academics and others who rely on works that are available for free have effectively been priced out of performing “Peter and the Wolf” and other pieces that had been mainstays of their repertoires.

    This is a better, more descriptive WSJ article on it…however, you may need a subscription to read it.

    Foreign Copyrights Upheld: Court Backs Reciprocal International Protection for Previously Public Material

    Oh, and again, SOPA/PIPA is about copyright and Intellectual Property rights.  Censorship is just the only way the tech companies could fire up the masses.

    Thank you. Everyone screaming CENSORSHIP is sort of missing the main point. Though I think censorship is another important issue, it’s just not the only thing at stake.

     
  4. you fed me the sun.

    Oh, look, internets, someone is making sense!  Rock on, Neil Gaiman!

    I know, I’m shocked, too.